home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- I just subscribed to www-talk, and haven't been able to read all the
- previous exchanges, so please forgive me if this is inappropriate...
-
- >3. I got rid of the TYPE attribute on anchor tags.
- >What's that thing for anyway. Does anybody use it?
-
- Yes, I have the following (experimental) use for it.
-
- I have written a program that translates texinfo (the GNU Emacs
- documentation format, which can be typeset using a special set of TeX
- macros as well as converted to a form of hypertext called Emacs INFO
- files) to HTML. Texinfo files contain the usual cross references
- between nodes as well as some more structured links that shape the set
- of nodes into a tree. Typical trees ("documents" in your proposed new
- terminology -- I like it!) can contain hundreds of nodes. My
- translator adds types to structured links that indicate whether it is
- a link to a child, a left or right sibling, a parent, or the root of
- the tree. This type is then used by a special WWW browser that I
- wrote to support tree browsing operations (which are actually
- compatible with the operations of the Emacs INFO browser). I think
- this is useful, and better than second-guessing the tree structure
- from where the links lead to.
-
- BTW, the results of my conversions (applied to several standard Emacs
- manuals as well as to documentation for Python, the language I'm using
- to write all my software in) can be viewed in the web rooted at
-
- http://voorn.cwi.nl:2784/default.html
-
- I have added all sorts of other tags and attributes that don't exist
- officially but which my own browser supports (e.g. font changes).
- Later I'll try to catch up with the current proposals for HTML and
- use that instead. I might also suggest other changes from which my
- texinfo conversion might benefit.
-
- Cheers,
-
- --Guido van Rossum, CWI, Amsterdam <guido@cwi.nl>
- "Are all your pets called Eric?"
-
-